this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
173 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

57933 readers
3919 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
L4s@lemmy.world
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
173
Threads Continues to Copy Twitter's Worst Elements With New Rate Limits (gizmodo.com)
submitted 1 year ago by mastermind@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] blakerboy777@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They set daily read limits that were comically low. Read limits obviously don't help with spam. They do help with scraping but it's again so low, it seems like it would pretty much just disable scraping rather than control it. 600 tweets A DAY?

[โ€“] nous@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The whole, "you can pay to have a higher rate limit", is the big telling part. And the big difference here, I believe I read that meta said to contact them if the limits are affecting you. Where as twitter just wants more money.