this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
591 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

60371 readers
6261 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

It is censorship, PERIOD

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 31 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

Censorship or not, tolerance is a social contract, and those who want to undo this system must be stopped by any means possible. Content moderation is actually the compromise.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

That depends on who's doing the moderation. If it's a government entity, that's censorship, and the only time I'm willing to accept it is if it's somehow actively harmful (i.e. terrorist plots and whatnot). If it's merely disgusting, that's for private entities to work out, and private entities absolutely have the right to moderate content they host however they choose.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

the only time I’m willing to accept it is if it’s somehow actively harmful

Oh, like the dissemination of propaganda originating from the troll farms of hostile powers? Good idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I feel like it is still censorship, but a degree of censorship required for public safety is tolerable...

Unless he's saying that social media sites policing content on their platform isn't censorship, because it's not. It's only censorship if it's a government doing it, you have the right to control what is said on a platform you own

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] los_chill@programming.dev 2 points 10 hours ago

These are platforms. It isn't censorship because they are private for-profit entities. They can host or deny any speech they want. And we can post on them or not and take our content elsewhere.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Also, propaganda is not speech.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›