this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37844 readers
1 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the judgment C-416/23, the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) received a slap in the face from the CJEU. The authority has – arbitrarily – set the number of complaints that data subjects can file at a maximum of two per month, even if one is affected by GDPR violations almost daily. The CJEU has now made it clear: as long as you do not file abusive complaints, all users have the right to have any GDPR violation remedied by the DSB. Unfortunately, Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) trying to get rid of complaints isn't just an Austrian problem. Our figures show an EU-wide problem with DPA inactivity.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 7 points 3 weeks ago

Right here is where the rubber meets the road. If the GDPR isn't enforced, the outcome is worse for everyone because the companies in breach will point out that nobody has successfully won a judgement against them, so in other words, they've done nothing wrong, whilst all the while they'll sell your private information out the side door to the highest bidder.