this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
861 points (98.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7326 readers
201 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

They let us eat cake.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The top 10% have 70.7% of wealth in the US currently (from the federal reserve website)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Looking at wealth distribution on a country-by-country basis is a mistake.

Take that US wealth distribution graph and then graph it with the rest of the world; the reason there's no revolution becomes obvious.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

please provide image

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Information control. Most people believe socialism is just taxes.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's less misinformation and more willing disbelief. People accept narratives that go along with what they believe supports that which benefits them. I highly recommend reading Masses, Elites, and Rebels: The Theory of "Brainwashing". People aren't stupid, they seek approval for their actions and support, which explains the anger expressed at factual debunking of their worldview.

[–] Jamablaya@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean...there was an attempt. The chronically online seem to think a revolution in the USA would be socialist, but these are Americans we're talking about. Its either be back to 1800s style libertarian ethics or fascism, corporatism, something like that, decimating government power not increasing it.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe. There was occupy wall street and an assassinated CEO this last week though

[–] Jamablaya@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Occupy wall street wasn't socialist, it was irritated, and Luigi seem like an RFK fan

[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

partially because total wealth is much higher?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Wait till most people are starving.

[–] Garibaldee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

can't say I'm a huge fan of Nick Cruse or the rest of RBN, but a graph's a graph I guess

[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

It's simple, fractions of the populace(both sides) are actually in a cult, they do what the cult says, they ignore anyone outside the cult if they go against their cults leadership, and they vote with how the cult tells them to vote. The country is not statistically a cult nation, but the cults know if they can get 1/8th of the populace to do what they say, it takes at least 1/8th of the populace to stand against them, and we don't have a leader, or even a coalition standing against them... It's just 1/8th of the populace crazy out of their minds voting their cults desires into reality, and it's happening with multiple groups, it's not even half the total population, but when approximately only half the voters actually vote, it doesn't take much to get control.

[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

The "wealth distribution" theory of unrest is so thoroughly debunked its insane to see people who still think in these terms. Smh.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›