this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
157 points (94.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40149 readers
665 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
157
Have I gone overboard? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by thanatos@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Have I went overboard? Any suggestions? Or help? I travel a lot and don't have a lot of time when I am home to setup and configure.

I'm using Cloudron on Linode for some things because I have StarLink and haven't figured out how to connect via internet to my LAN yet. I can use VPN with the router but it seems wonky.

2 NAS

2 Raspberry Pi's with DNS servers

Raspberry Pi with HomeAssistant

Separate NVR for cameras

Several Docker containers on one of NAS

A Raspberry Pi with DietPi. a 1TB attached drive and Docker Containers.

Cloudron on Linode for when I'm away from home.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Using IP and port to connect? Definitely not going far enough yet!

[–] thanatos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How else would I? Not exposing it to the WAN and with StarLink, VPN is the solution. Though not a network guy either.

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Subdomains with traffic routed through a reverse proxy listening on 80 and 443 (HTTPS everything with certbot SSLs) with a dynamic DNS client updating your DNS provider whenever your IP address changes.

[–] thanatos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that works with Starlink (CGNAT)

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IIRC you can use DNS challenge behind a CGNAT, but you still wouldn't be able to access the system remotely. But you could use Tailscale for that, or Headscale on your VPS. You could also put a wireguard server on your VPS.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 3 points 1 year ago

Private DNS within your Lan and your choice of proxy to remap ports

[–] peter@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly if you haven't the time to troubleshoot issues you might struggle to keep all of those up and running

[–] thanatos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The NAS stuff has been running almost a year now. Even had enough time to migrate it from the 220 to the 923. I said I didn't have a lot of time, not no time. ;p

[–] Scew@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Why I haven't delved back into any persistent self-hosting yet.

[–] curioushom@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would recommend Tailscale for connecting to the home network. You could run it on each box if running it on the router is wonky.

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Zerotier also works well and is more flexible in my experience

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Looks cool dude. Have you tried using Traefik on docker? You can name your service like https:// homeassistant.thanatos instead of 192 .168.1.1:8080.

It's pretty cool and it can even handle SSL certs.

[–] schmurnan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would love an up-to-date tutorial on how to do this without a domain name. I don’t own one but would still much prefer to use https://jellyfin.myserver.home than http://192.168.1.200:8096.

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

Hiya! You can use homelab.express if you'd like.

[–] thanatos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll have to check this out. Any suggestions on where to start? Would this also solve the issue of some containers requiring ssl and domain?

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I followed this guy's tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liV3c9m_OX8

You do need your own domain name but I got one on namecheap for like $15 per year. It's worth it.

[–] SugarSnack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can go so much cheaper than that as well, I've had .xyz and .party domains for less than $2 per year with namecheap

[–] ChrislyBear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had UrBackup running for 6 months+. It wasn't reliably backing things up, configuring it to be accessible via Internet is almost impossible, adding clienta is a hassle and the config isn't very user friendly.

Furthermore I got the inpression, that it's backups aren't reliable; restoring files without UrBackup might be impossible.

That's why I'm now back at a incremental rsync backup script. It's reliable, you can just restore things by copying them back via ssh and it uses a lot less space (!!!) than the UrBackup backups.

[–] thanatos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not familiar with rsync, got a copy or link for that script?

[–] ChrislyBear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used this one, with some modifications, like command line parameters to reuse it for different backup jobs.

I've packaged it into a little docker container that runs crond and runs the script every day for a few backup pairs.

[–] thanatos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if you expected to post a script or link and it didn't work or if it's error on my part.

[–] chanunnaki@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Overboard? If anything, you haven't gone far enough

[–] Rearsays@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

You’ve gone overboard when you’ve had experience with most of the software on the awesome self hosting lists

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sure looks like the bare essentials to me.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Enjoy your validation, it is deserved. ;)

[–] clasificado@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's that interface?

[–] thisNotMyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ben phelp's homepage (you can find it on github)

[–] ulemmyagain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Man I love heimdall

[–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TeamViewer is really nice when you're on the road a lot. That way if you need to hop in and change something, you can do it from pretty much anywhere.

[–] rambos@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TeamViewer is good until they decide its not personal use anymore. Better go for AnyDesk or even better RustDesk if you need remote desktop. But why not just wireguard or tailscale?

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Or when the platform gets compromised and they refuse to admit it and blame the customers instead

[–] please_lemmy_out@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yup, if you just use a couple different IPs in a given time they will arbitrarily mark you as requiring a license.

[–] ChrislyBear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, use Mesh Central 2! It's free, you can self-host it and using a little agent you can connect to any machine from it via console or even via a desktop interface without bothering with VNC etc.

https://www.meshcommander.com/meshcentral2

[–] urvy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For VPN, PiVPN is super easy to setup and use. I dont even have a static IP with my ISP but it works like a charm with DynDNS, I use no-ip but there are plenty of options.

[–] thanatos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I actually went and messed with openvpn again and got it working great with the router.

[–] thanatos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, fixed it and been adding....

[–] Dubois_arache@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I like the TinyTinyRSS logo :P

load more comments
view more: next ›