this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30567 readers
266 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Butterbee@beehaw.org 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't wait to watch the steam charts. I'd be especially interested once they put the other blizzard titles on Steam as well since then we can estimate the number of players per game out of the "monthly active users" they report in their quarterly.

Blizzard is desperate here. And if there's one thing about the internet it's that people are good as sharks for smelling blood in the water. It's the objectively correct move, but it could still end up backfiring if people can actually SEE just how dead the game is, and leave negative steam reviews.

Also, who exactly is going to install it through steam? Almost everyone who was going to play Overwatch already has. There's going to be a minimum of people who just don't want to have any game launcher but steam on their pc and really wanted to play Overwatch but couldn't stomach the battle.net client. If it gets steam deck certified that is the only draw I can really see aside from a smattering of casual new sign ups.

Sad days. This was my favourite game for a very long time and it feels like potential squandered on a level not seen until Musk came along and bought Twitter.

[–] liminis@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Blizzard is desperate here. Am I right in thinking this is the first time they've put anything on Steam?

Enjoyed Overwatch back in the day, i.e. when it was new; but really not a fan of them reducing team sizes to make it a more conventional "fit" with other 'esports'.

[–] mtlvmpr@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

just how dead the game is

Is it though? Can't be by player numbers since it takes less time to get in match than CS:GO and you wouldn't call that dead.

Also, who exactly is going to install it through steam?

I am. It's the only game I have on Battle net and after OW2 is on Steam I can uninstall Battle net.

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I highly doubt Battle net will be removed.

Like so many titles before it, it's likely you'll just get to launch Battle net from Steam now.

So, no reason to uninstall anything. Or install anything for that matter.

[–] mtlvmpr@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the post they made it looked like you only need to link accounts but we'll see when it actually happens.

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, sure. But I have a sneaking suspicion you still need both Battle Net and Steam installed and running for it to work.

Kinda like GOG Galaxy works with both Steam and EGS. It can manage all your other launchers, but they need to be running.

[–] vanquesse@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

quarterly reports of MAU for blizz went from 45mil at OW2 launch to 27mil to 26mil and the last one has 10mil diablo 4 players. It may not be dead but it's hemorrhaging players like there's no tomorrow.

Launch quarter for OW2 also had a wow expansion launch but it sounds like it was mostly bought by the smaller, core fanbase who have kept playing. Either way, adding 10mil MAU in Q2 and not being able to get the number above Q1 via a new game does not speak well of their retention.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 year ago

Oh boi

checks the steam page

writes a negative review

leaves

[–] Madiator2011@lm.madiator.cloud 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago

That's why they're putting it on Steam. They're hoping for an injection of players

[–] Plain@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I haven't actually played ow2 after a few tens to the low hundreds of hours I played in ow1. Is it true that they're locking characters behind battle passes now?

[–] tsuni@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Yep, since the very beginning

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you have 3 options:

  • Pay 10bucks every 4ish months to get the hero immediately
  • grind 45 levels of the free battlepass (note that the hero is locked in competitive for the first 3 weeks). Personally this takes me about 10hrs.
  • wait until the season ends and do some rather trivial challenges (essentially play a tutorial for the character and play like 20 games)

Personally I see it as a subscription based game, and 3bucks/mo is pretty fair imo. like all competitive MP games, it doesn't really make much sense to play it unless you can play a fair amount of it.

[–] hotchurkey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is pretty much in line with my experience. As someone who didn’t play Overwatch 1, the monetization through the battle pass really doesn’t feel all that bad, but I totally understand how people who played Overwatch 1 from the start would be unhappy with it.

I know it might not be a popular opinion here, but I play a lot of Overwatch and actually find it really enjoyable. It doesn’t feel like a dead game at all. Plenty of people playing, and really easy to find matches. Plus if you’re willing to use Bing for Microsoft Rewards (which if you’re not is totally fair) you can use that to get the coins for the battle pass rather than paying.

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don't mind OW's new monetization model, that's fine and all, but Bing?!

Why would you do that to yourself?

[–] Silviecat44@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Bing is great now wdym

[–] Silviecat44@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I use bing to get game pass. Great system

[–] mrmacduggan@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Miserable game design for something that is trying to get players to come back every few months for content releases. "You can't play the new hero until you grind for it until you burn out or pay" is just not a compelling pitch to get people to resume playing your game.

It's only going to get worse over time as the proportion of premium characters grows... 😐

[–] Elbullazul@lem.elbullazul.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The last few characters were trash anyways

[–] 0U714W@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago

Boycott Blizzard-Activision(-Microsoft?).

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

I rather play Hunt:Showndown, Squad or BattleBit. OW is outdated

[–] ExoMonk@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've been out of the loop on this game. I really liked the first one, it brought back a lot of team fortress 2 memories. How bad is the second one? The general sentiment is "bad".

[–] astrionic@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

There isn't really a "second one". Overwatch 2 was just a patch with essentially two major changes. They changed the monetisation, making the game free-to-play and introducing the battle pass. An especially unpopular change is that new heroes now have to be bought with real money or unlocked through the battle pass. The other big change is the move from 6v6 to 5v5, which was controversial. There are definitely some positives, like getting rid of the "double shield meta", which did make the game more fun. But there's also more pressure and focus on the single tank.

The game is free and if you bought OW1 you still have all your stuff (cosmetics and all the non-OW2 heroes), so if you're curious you can just check it out. Personally I'm still enjoying the game but there's also a lot of valid criticism.

[–] ADHDefy@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Idk if it's "bad," exactly, but I don't like it. I liked the meta for the first game way more, I miss the old 6v6 team structure, I don't like the changes made to my favorite characters, and the monetization is really sucky. It felt to me like they took everything that was wrong with the first game, kept it as is, and then took a bunch of the good stuff and made it worse. lol

But that's just my opinion, I know there are def people that like it. I only wish they'd release "Overwatch Classic" or something so that people who prefer OW1 can still play it--ideally with the lootboxes removed and a way to unlock character skins and stuff by playing those characters and progressing, but I'd honestly take just like a snapshot of the last stable release before the OW2 update. It was one of my favorite games and I just really don't like the OW2 updates. 😥

[–] flakusha@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still requires 3rd party account and separate launcher, am I right?

[–] forgotaboutlaye@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Aparently not -- the store page doesn't say it requires a third party launcher (which it says for EA and Rockstar Games), only that you'll need a battle.net account, which you could create online. A journalist has also confirmed this on twitter, although I don't have a link right now.

[–] sylverstream@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

I've played it on xbox recently. Initially loved it but after playing for some time I realised I was getting addicted and grumpy. On lower levels still enough players but I don't trust the intentions of Blizzard and their matchmaking algorithm.

[–] Headcannon@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I have hundreds of hours in OW1 and about 40 in OW2. I will never play a blizzard game again. Blizzard lied about what OW2 would be. Broke the games balance , and now throw out battle pass after battle pass. The vitriol of the player base has intensified as everyone’s frustration increased. One of my most played and beloved games absolutely ruined.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Play some Paladins instead!

load more comments
view more: next ›