This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/v022450781 on 2024-11-14 20:40:20+00:00.
As you may have noticed, The New York Times and The Washington Post have not reported on the recent UAP hearing in Congress. As a media professor, I am profoundly disturbed that both of these newspapers would prioritize stories like a front-page cooking recipe over a critical, historic event with profound implications for both the future and our understanding of reality. The New York Times and The Washington Post are blatantly compromising their journalistic integrity and it's important for us to ask: Why are they censoring a story of this magnitude?
One can only speculate that powerful special interests are influencing their editorial decisions, and have prompted them to ignore and suppress the most significant story in human history. The New York Times is considered the "Gold Standard" for a large segment of the population, and I recall that a Redditor last year gave an example of their own family member rationalizing their belief that UFOs are not real by virtue of not recieving coverage in the New York Times.
Major media outlets often rely on close relationships with government and military sources. It’s plausible that these relationships have led them to withhold coverage of this story for their own interests rather than the public’s. Furthermore, a serious investigation into the government’s withholding of UFO information might raise uncomfortable accountability questions for media companies with ties to the military and intelligence community.
The public deserves an honest, uncompromised exploration of the truth—one that isn’t filtered by access deals or other conflicts of interest that undermine the public good.
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
-George Orwell