this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
287 points (99.0% liked)

science

14779 readers
141 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

looks like that one soup dish in the fridge

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

“Never heard of it” –Liar in Chief

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago

It’s similar enhancements that show different wavelengths of light similar to national weather service radar and satellite imagery.

They can filter at infrared or other wavelengths and I’m sure now they are getting better and better at distinguishing different data at different levels in the atmosphere.

We see similar images on the nightly news weather reports. Not a big deal but it is beautiful because it is Jupiter.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Absolutely wild, anyone know what part of the spectrum this is in?

[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

what a fucked up planet

we should live there

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

we should ~~live~~ die there

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It's cause it's been photoshopped. It doesn't actually look that way

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Not sure how they can get away with these artistically enhanced photographs of Jupiter. Show us what it'd look like with the naked eye from orbit, not these made up versions.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

This is quite a good comparison

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

The JunoCam page makes Juno’s raw image data publicly accessible and allows contributors to upload modified versions of the images to highlight special features. The mission doesn’t have a team of scientists dedicated to image processing, writes Forbes’ Jamie Carter, so it relies on the work of citizen scientists to create stunning and artful interpretations of the data.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

But we already have lots of pictures in the visual spectrum. We didn't even need to send a probe for that. You can use a telescope from Earth.

[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago

Agree. I hate this "further processed" crap. Processed how? At least show the unedited source image too.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And at the center under miles of roiling gasses is a giant diamond.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 4 days ago

Doesn’t it rain diamonds on Jupiter, similar to hail and snow storms on earth except that the pressures and temperatures make it rain diamonds

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Reminds my of that Looney Toons episode where Daffy Duck and Bugs Bunny find all this treasure and Daffy ends up with just a giant pearl. It was only giant because he was shrunken down to small size by the end of the episode.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago

The "with color enhancements" part makes me just want to see it as it would naturally look.