this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34893 readers
1173 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zante@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes? “Consciously” and “knowingly” would be synonyms in the context.

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

Very subtle and nuanced difference. They are frequently used interchangeably.

Consciously would suggest awareness of the fault. Knowingly would fit better here because it implies broader understanding of selling faulty chips (eg to hit a target) even though they might cause problem .

In my opinion .

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 week ago

They are from legal perspective though?

What does the statute says?

[–] Analog@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Good. I hope the lawsuit is successful. Intel did not handle this very well, to say the least.

Mistakes are OK. How you handle them makes a difference and Intel has been a shitshow on this front. For a long time.

If they had been acting in good faith the entire time this lawsuit would not exist.