this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
126 points (98.5% liked)

Europe

1509 readers
931 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/46758406

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is there also a face mask exception? They aren't handy for just pandemics.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

Yes there is

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't know how I feel about this.

Which is worse, the government telling people that they can't wear certain clothes (and let's be real, at least some of the proponents of implementing this are doing it in an Islamophobic way), or allowing a practice that's clearly intended to cover women up and treat them as second class citizens within their Islamic culture?

Which is right? Which is wrong? I feel so conflicted about this.

I don't want the state dictating dress code, that's absolutely ludicrous, but I also don't want an oppressive sexist religion dictating that women need to cover up otherwise (ghasp!) a man might see their skin.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i'd say that the better way to let women dress freely is working to get rid of the pressures on them in the first place, rather than forcing them to not dress a certain way in an attempt to give them choice in what to wear.

Yeah it's a lot harder than simply banning face coverings, but that's because it actually solves the problem rather than swiping it under the rug..

[–] lud@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That would be great, but how exactly? Banning religions that encourage/forces it?

The only reason I could see is to highly educate everyone but that's way easier said than done.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah but... how?

[–] geissi@feddit.org 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is also permitted for artistic and entertainment performances and for advertising purposes.

Ah they learned from the Austrians

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Scarfs, costume masks and medical face masks are allowed in Austria too, but only under special circumstances, e.g. costumes are permitted only for "customs events" (Brauchtumsveranstaltungen) and thus are forbidden for everyday use. Verschleierungsverbot Γ–sterreich
However, you can get fined for wearing a scarf if the police officer perceives it to be not cold enough. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/panorama/oesterreich-burkaverbot-trifft-maskottchen-und-radfahrer-1.3700378

[–] schlecknits@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Medical reasons to my knowledge is defined rather limited. There's an exception but in doubt you have to show a doctor's note saying that you need to wear a mask, otherwise you could be forced to unmask. So if you choose to do preventative masking but aren't ill yourself this isn't technically allowed - this isn't widely enforced, but still something that wasn't thought quite through.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Oh,it was thought through very much by some... Some parts of the SVP are very happy about it...

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What if your identity as a furry? Obviously it covers your face, but it’s sort is like a costume. There are also furry conventions, so maybe that’s the sort of event/festival that would count as an exception.

It's about covering your face in public, i.e. on the festival venue it would be O.K., in public transport possibly not.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Non-European here. What's the purpose of bans like these? The obvious cause appears to be racism/Islamophobia, but is there something else?

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You got it. Sometimes politicians say its for "security" so when someone is at a protest they can just arrest them just for wearing a mask.

that was covered by already existing laws afaik

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 7 points 1 week ago

You call it islamophobia, some call it an effort to curb radicalisation

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep, islamophobia. Our far right party passed it. They also passed a law banning minarets.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

Making video surveillance more effective is one.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

As a muslim, the book mentions covering up hair only. Face covering is never mentioned anywhere, and people using it are misinterpreting Quran.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But what about Covid masks? What if another pandemic happen?

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's called an "exception". Look it up.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not exceptional enough to look it up, but I take exception to you telling me to look it up without so much as a "please". I hope this kind of behaviour is just an exception, and not the exception that proves the rule.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm just making a stupid comment because of your stupid comment. No need to make it personal.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago

What? I thought we were having pleasant banter

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί