this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
42 points (95.7% liked)

Futurology

1776 readers
117 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's kind of amazing how much Google has squandered.

Let's set software aside for a second, and look at hardware. They essentiualy sat on one of the only "market ready" competitors to Nvidia GPUs (TPUs) for years, instead of selling and distributing them. They could have been eating some of Nvidia's pie right now if they were slightly less monopolistic and short-sighted.

I would kill (and pay money) to have a TPU in my desktop right now. I'd have contributed to all sorts of ML projects with it. But nope.

Same with the Pixel. What an incredibly dominant position for them to be on, only to... make it boring, expensive, and copy other phone designs.

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Right? It has been in free fall for a while now.

[–] don@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

~~may soon be~~ long since has been

It’s been so fucking long since I’ve used anything directly related to the goog’s …search thing whatever that I frankly have no idea how bad it is now, compared to when it got so bad for me a decade ago that I quit it altogether.

The giants of tech have been falling for quite some time now.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The alternatives havent been better.

Its like search engines all shit the bed 9-12 months ago. Specific pages I constantly referenced and never bookmarked just stopped showing up on Google searches pages 1-5 like they never existed. Lord help you if you try to find anything older than a year or not monotized to some AI article.

I think theyve finally created a feedback loop of bullshit. I mean Ive tried every search engine and its pretty much the same. Monkey see monkey do.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What really grinds my gears is that search engines simply do not show you the thing you are looking for.

Even when you put explicit captions and quotes around your search topic it will just ignore them and show you other stuff.

This issue is not limited to google. Start page, ecosia search, Bing, (God forbid you use that) all of them simply choose to ignore your explicit groupings of words.

I am also running a locally hosted searx server, and it's not much better because the results that it gets come from other search engines.

Do we need to build a federated search system to replace Google and everything else?

I think the answer is yes.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I hate it when it does that. It guesses based on your keywords what you are looking for and just shows the results for that. And they always seem to mix in some "popular" links for no apparent reason.

This weekend I was looking up more info on something specific that happened in Formula One. But the inclusion of the word "One" meant that my search would be ignored and it would just show shit about Liam Payne from One Direction. Like wtf. And it happened in Bing (DDG) as well as Google.

I get why it's the case, but I hate that search engines don't search using literal terms any more. Recently I was looking for something I had looked up before but forgot. I know one old forum post where I had found the exact answer and I knew one exact phrase because it was worded a bit weird. No matter what I did I could not find it. I figured I misremembered the phrase. Until I eventually found the post with the exact literal phrase I searched for. Utterly useless.

[–] randomperson@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

Start paying for your search engine and you can get better results. I’ve been pretty happy with Kagi.com

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

soon

As someone who has recently searched with Google.com, lmao.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago

My comprehensive survey of one person says otherwise.