this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
400 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers
6279 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So which agency is going to be doing something about it?

[–] basmati@lemmus.org 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Militias are mostly made up of police, FBI and CIA members, so no agency is going to interfere.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Local police, maybe. The other two have task forces that regularly take these clowns down, so if there are some mixed into the group, they're really fucking bad at their jobs.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The worst thing the CIA does is hookers and blow. They're not looking to get caught up in a right-wing coup.

[–] basmati@lemmus.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You dropped the /s, you are describing the number one cause of regime change globally in the last hundred years.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My bad. I meant here. They're not trying to start shit in the US.

I do think they've mostly stopped in the last 40 though.

[–] basmati@lemmus.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe, they did sell crack domestically just forty years ago, and no one really knows where the fentanyl crisis got most of its start, or who manufactures the majority of the supply.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

we know exactly where the fentanyl crisis got its start: Over prescription and aggressive marketing of opioid painkillers by the pharma industry. And we know exactly where most of the fentanyl is manufactured: China.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Fun fact, we know how it gets into the states.

The fentanyl, or the precursor chemicals are shipped to Mexico, and then white Americans drive across the border and pick up one or two brick sized packages that then sell for millions.

The packages are easy to hide, and racist border control doesn't search the white guy crossing the border with nearly as much enthusiasm as they do the brown guys crossing the same border.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The CIA focuses on international, uhh... "activities". If you want their domestic counterpart, you want the NSA.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

While there are a somewhat decent amount of police, the vast majority of people in these militias are middle management, to low level office workers, blue collar workers, and service workers.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

NSA - no such agency

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

RTFA - far-right militias are. And they're doing a bang up job.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A trove of leaked internal messages and documents from the militia American Patriots Three Percent—also known as AP3—reveals how the group coordinated with election denial groups as part of a plan to conduct paramilitary surveillance of ballot boxes during the midterm elections in 2022.

You mean those nutjobs that showed up to stand around ballot boxes with rifles weren't all acting alone?

fryshockedmeme.gif

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m probably gonna go as offline as possible from election day until the inauguration.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I really should as well. I'm insanely depressed about it all. It really feels absolutely hopeless.

Everyone still needs to vote, but I'm convinced they won't even need to ratfuck this one. I really believe he's just going to outright win if the polls are the same kind of fucked as they have been for the last decade... Midterm polling is more accurate, but any poll with Trump on it seems to be wayyyy inaccurate :(

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Highly encourage turning that election anxiety into action

Find opportunities to volunteer for dems around you and online

Write letters to voters in swing states or in competitive downballot races


On the flip side, Trump was overestimated in the Republican primaries this year. Pollsters have dramatically altered their polling this year in ways that are going to be more favorable to trump this year.

For instance, about 2/3rd of polls are now using recall polling which has historically not been used by pollsters because it tend to overstate the losing party of the election and underestimate the winners. Even non-recall polls have made changes like much more heavily sampling rural voters. Not to mention that the numbers of polls from partisian republican pollsters has been increasing which skews polling averages

Could he still be underestimated with all those changes, maybe, but at the same time I wouldn't assume that's anything given

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's almost like the professional pollsters are also aware of all these common knowledge facts and try to correct.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

I was massively depressed about it in 2020. I'm less depressed about it now (I started taking an antidepressant since). I am afraid, but also have some hope that I didn't have previously because his bullshit is very known in a way that it wasn't before. I hope you're all right. Seek help if you can. I plan to leave this country if he gets re-elected, so it's not like I'm dancing on good vibes with the antidepressant.

[–] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

I assume the problem is the following:

If there is dirt on a Democrat, the Republicans read it to feel backed up on their opinion and the democrats read it to see if it is true and if they need to demonstrate for a change in leadership

If there is dirt on a republican, the Republicans ignore it because they don't believe it, and many democrats ignore it because they allready know it3

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

So what was the “little incident in Arizona”?