this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
135 points (97.9% liked)

science

14806 readers
467 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/13574268

A really innovative study that went beyond statistical association and actually planted trees in low-tree neighborhoods and measured the impacts.

After the plantings, the research team reassessed residents' health. They found that those living in the greened area had 13-20% lower levels of a biomarker of general inflammation, a measure called high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) than those living in the areas that did not receive any new trees or shrubs. Higher levels of hsCRP are strongly associated with a risk of cardiovascular disease and are an even stronger indicator of heart attack than cholesterol levels. Higher CRP levels also indicate a higher risk of diabetes and certain cancers.

A reduction of hsCRP by this percentage corresponds to nearly 10-15% reduction in the risk of heart attacks, cancer or dying from any disease.

Although several previous studies have found an association between living in areas of high surrounding greenness and health, this is the first study to show that a deliberate increase in greenness in the neighborhood can improve health.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Brilliant! Yet another reason, scientifically backed, that we should plant MOAR trees!

[–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

I love trees, and they now also help us to stay healthier??! We need dense trees in all streets!

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

To anyone with severe allergies: lol jk

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Until you fall out of one

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lower inflammation, except for people with pollen allergies for the species of trees around them

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

yeah, we should cut down all the trees so people (like me) don't have allergy symptoms /s

the study didnt exclude people with allergies.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

People have allergies to specific allergens, from specific plants. Not all plants/trees are going to give people an allergic reaction.