We've known those AI paper detection services were junk from the get go with their huge false positive rate on even native English papers.
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
20 readers
4 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!
founded 2 years ago
That's because all non English speakers are robots
Huh. A bunch of brand new services built by a new handful of techbros has a bias against people who don’t look and sound like them? That is quite the lofty accusation! /s
Is kbin a place where we just call everyone we don't like "techbros"?
Just include some properly-cited facts, some opinion, some insight, something original, and we'll be certain that your writing wasn't AI-generated shit.
Also, these detectors are pretty worthless if that's what they're triggering on. AI never makes a spelling mistake. I've never seen it make a grammar mistake, because all it does is spew out the most likely next word based on copyright infringement on an unimaginable scale. It doesn't produce the kind of non-idomatic constructions that break the flow of the text for native speakers, because it never generates anything worth reading.