this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5238 readers
749 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] n0m4n@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Climate change is going to affect corporations as much or more than the will affect every other person on the planet. Corporations cannot ignore what is happening without risking becoming extinct. themselves. Greenwashing will not help our situation. But the slowest and least intelligent dinosaurs lead the worst of the problem causing industries. Until they are forced to help, they will not lift a finger.

These mangers, by law, are required to take care of their owners (stockholders) interests, first. As such, moral arguments are worse than a waste of time. Moral arguments divert attention away from what must be addressed.

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wait i thought republicans were against regulations.

[–] pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Only when convenient

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans who lead the House Financial Services Committee plan to spend the next few weeks holding hearings and voting on bills designed to send a clear signal: Corporations, in particular big investment managers, should think twice about integrating climate and social goals into their business plans. Committee conservatives will target the process in which advocates pressure public companies to adopt environmental, social and governance (ESG) goals using the shareholder voting process.

So they're explicitly saying that corporations are not allowed to even plan to avoid destroying the planet. Short-term profit must be the goal, even at the ultimate price. Republicans have a death wish for us all.

[–] Holodeck_Moriarty@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

This is the opposite of what I assumed from the post title. Damn, it thought for a second that they were coming around.