this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
1236 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
5125 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago
[–] StormWalker@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

"Kagi Search" looks cool. The examples of searches look far superior to even that of google.

But it's $5 per month. (No ads) Or $8 for couples. Even so I think I will try it. The search results look really good.

Has anyone here used Kagi Search?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago

I've been using it for the last few months, and while it doesn't offer as many "nice to have" features as Google (like automatically finding mask results need in where you are), the core functionality works great, and the lack of ads is refreshing.

[–] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I wanted to like Kagi, but their Brave fiasco turned me off of them for good

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 4 months ago

But it's $5 per month. (No adds)

The price seems reasonable IMO. Search engines are expensive to run, and I'm not sure they'd even be breaking even at the moment.

They have a "small web" search that searches through small sites like blogs, which I really like. Sometimes there's small sites that have great info but aren't ranked very high in Google due to all the SEO spam and Google's preference for major sites.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Big tech needs far stricter regulations but I don't think people would like the internet very much if Google was forced to sell off services like YouTube. Nobody else is offering unlimited free hosting, discoverability, promotion, and bandwidth for video content and nobody ever will again. If the chromium project was sold off to some other shitty tech company, do you really think they'd keep the open source 'ungoogled' version readily available for everyone? A Google breakup would just mean that other tech companies like Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, etc get more powerful.

If there's an appetite for breakups why not start with the companies that control our food and news

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 4 points 4 months ago

It's not 2010, video streaming isn't unprofitable anymore and Youtube doesn't have a monopoly on it. Chromium is open source, and as far as I'm concerned, Google has been actively making it worse with their efforts to fill it with ads.

More breakups do sound good, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›