I mean I'm too old to "get it" too, but this blog post just reads like an old man yelling at kids to get off their lawn lol
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
407 points (93.8% liked)
Technology
59092 readers
6622 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I will not now, nor will I ever, call Mark Zuckerberg’s company “Meta”
ok
load more comments
(3 replies)
Twitter thrived with its own micro-celebrities, many of whom were anonymous Socialists with the word “boner” in their handles. It’s not clear if they’re coming to a Mark Zuckerberg-owned social network.
Twitter’s best service was instant takes on breaking news. Are bland, micromanaged Instagram celebs suddenly going to have something interesting to say during a presidential debate?
That pretty much sums up why I never used Twitter. That sounds horrible.
Is there something else of value that you think micro-blogging can provide that causes people to login to it on a daily basis?
The entire point of micro-blogging is essentially "this is my opinion on x" shouted into the algorithm where the algorithm then picks up what is popular among the userbase. Invariably the only thing that provides something constant and new to talk about every single day is breaking news.
I think it's a horrible form factor for expressing your opinion. The text limit inherently causes reductivism and "hot takes" which lack nuance and spread misinformation. I think it's a shitty form factor for serious topics. If it's something relatively harmless like jokes and memes then I don't think it's too harmful.
The text limit inherently causes reductivism and “hot takes” which lack nuance and spread misinformation.
I'm confused. Are you trying to imply that long articles do not do the same thing? Everything on the internet is clickbait and outrage fuel these days. Not just on Twitter. It's prevalent on reddit, which I would say has been the epicentre of much more serious problems than twitter ever caused: theredpill manosphere community which has evolved into Andrew Tate today, incels, pizzagate, etc.
I think if we compared the damage done by every platform out there Twitter would actually be at the lower end. It's great at causing a lot of extremely minor drama and arguably creates a lot more minor shit than other ones (which probably drives its high activity), but has generally avoided causing extremely serious shit unlike other longform platforms.
What metatrap does the best, trial and error & if it fails they'll throw some Gs on somebody who succeeded
Yeah I don't think any big social media company has ever successfully launched a new website, only bought startups.
Wait, what's wrong with the Try Guys? Or did I misinterpret that?