this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
162 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
4721 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 84 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Punished for saying the quiet part waaaayyyy too loudly.

It caused quite the Führer.

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

No no, let him cook

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They're only making it quiet; the part that is going to place tens of thousands of people invested in the project into government if Trump is elected is still happening:

Another arm of the project, a personnel database of more than 20,000 applicants for potential political appointments should Trump be reelected, will remain in operation, people familiar with the matter said.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Project 2025 only goes away when Republicans stop steamrolling local elections for powerful positions. You can't just vote in the presidential election.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is that the one Meta just hired?

[–] mephiska@kbin.run 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, the one Meta hired just wrote the cybersecurity sections.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

wrote the cybersecurity sections.

Oh what?? What kind of crap did they write for cybersecurity??

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

But but trump didnt know anything about P2025, why would he influence them????

[–] t3h_fool@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

In no place does Trump ever specify which ideas he disagrees with. He just doesn't want to be associated with it. He is not really disavowing the ideas, AFAICT. It kind of makes me mad that it is being reported that he is distancing himself from P2025. Because... not really.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Good riddance.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Yet project 2025 still exists.

Hmmm.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

CNN Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

CNN is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.