this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
1714 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm not worried at all about Zuck taking over Mastodon at all, they'll try but they are just so incompetent, because literally every single product idea they have they either stole or bought from somebody else. Great tech, terrible products, zero originality is the Facebook mantra and that is because they have a delusional CEO that they can't fire, because Zuck has delude himself into thinking he's an "ideas" guy like Jobs instead of an "executions" guy like Bezos that he really is, and until he realizes that, he will always fail.

(also, delusional for actually thinking Ready Player One is a good book)

If making a TikTok clone didn't get people to switch from TikTok, why would they think making a Twitter clone is going to get people to switch from Twitter?

The only way I see Facebook being a threat is when they give up on making their Twitter clone and start providing easy subscription service hosting for Mastodon/Lemmy to EEE. THAT would be the time to worry.

[–] Redecco@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I feel like we are seeing lots of these tech companies just clawing at new innovations for profit cause they can't seem to run a stable business otherwise without fucking things up somehow. See the the crypto/nft boom, AI and it's rapid and still somewhat untested and shoddy implementation, etc. We've got strikes popping up in the US as the months go on cause people are definitely feeling the shittification of things in multiple industries including tech and entertainment as of late.

Everything tech companies like meta have been doing in the last several years is looking for their next growth fix to keep their investors happy while running their business like a toddler between sweets.

Elon happened to set Twitter on fire, Instagram is failing to beat TikTok in short form content or even competing with things like YouTube, Facebook itself has been shriveling up over the years, now there's some cool new tech space in the Fediverse and no corporates taking advantage of it - probably looks like early crypto to Zuck if he can swoop in and outpace the open source projects with enough funding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] luckystarr@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While you may dismiss Zuckerberg as delusional, he's shown a talent for using others' ideas and making them profitable under Facebook. The success of Instagram and WhatsApp is proof. Google+ is nowhere to be seen anymore.

As for Mastodon, underestimating Meta's potential threat, particularly federating with Mastodon (this can be seen as "easy hosting" of something like Mastodon), might be a mistake. Even without originality, they have the resources to cause significant disruption.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] YellowTraveller@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Do you really need to import a CSV just to block a single domaine? Sounds over complicated

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago

This is for instance admins rather than users.

This function is designed to allow you to maintain a list of blocked domains rather than just one.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Roundcat@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just won't be apart of any instance that chooses to be federated with Meta. There are many people like me, and I hope kbin and most lemmy instance owners are aware of this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DanseMacabre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (22 children)

Threads being in the Fediverse is a plus for me, not a negative. It means I could follow regular people and friends who would never in a million years join places like Mastodon or Lemmy while I still get the benefits of being on those platforms, all while being shielded from Meta’s ads and data harvesting. The only issue is I don’t actually believe Zuck will go through with it. They’ll either never federate or severely limit it if they do.

Mastodon themselves have put out a post outlining how this will affect them (it won’t) and how EEE is not a threat. If Meta does eventually opt out of ActivityPub then cool. It’s not like that’s why Mastodon users were there in the first place.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Bear in mind that this blocks you from seeing Threads posts on your profile. Unless you private your profile, this changes nothing as far as what they're able to see/pull from your account. Their official documentation states that the block only prevents users from seeing or retrieving content from those servers. You'd probably have to be performing some DNS-level filtering on incoming requests or web firewalling from the host level to prevent their incoming requests.

[–] Skepticpunk@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can't you get banned from Threads? What happens when someone posts content on a Fediverse server that isn't supposed to be allowed on Threads? Porn, for example.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ptsdstillinmymind@lemmy.studio 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sab@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

For kbin users to unilaterally block content from threads:

  1. Go to /d/threads.net
  2. Click the block button next to the subscribe one

The only drawback is that it will only start working after the first piece of content from threads.net has been shared on your instance - for now it returns a 404 not found.

Edit: Mileage may vary, depending on how Threads solves its fediverse integration.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sephtis-6@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Did meta anounce that threads will be compatible with mastadon or did miss something.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So I'm on Threads (occupational hazard, I have Instagram for work) and it's a surreal experience. It's like if everyone you know on Facebook and Twitter joined you on a muted Tumblr overlay. Someone's already @'d Zuck to ask for a "home feed that's just your follows." So... like Mastodon.

exaggerated_eye_roll.wav

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›