this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
309 points (82.1% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
5050 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Will people here use/try Meta's #threads when available? Would love to know the reasons or if it would be just for fun/curiosity.

The amount of data collected is insane imo.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago
[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why even ask that question on Lemmy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dab@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, giving all my personal data to Meta for an account I’d hardly use doesn’t seem worth it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mystech@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

That's like getting picked up from Catholic Boys Choir by a white van with "Free Candy" spray painted on the side.

[–] rschecht@lemm.live 13 points 1 year ago

Never. Just look what data they collect.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meta is just Facebook trying to hide their awful reputation under a new name. I will never call them Meta.

I'll be damned if I'm going to use any more of their spy products than I have to, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elltee@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

That's gonna be a no from me, dawg.

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

No, bye Zuck.

[–] CavalierBob@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[–] DriftKaiser@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Hell no. Facebook got worse since they shoved every useless ads and recommended posts to your own face.

[–] kyle1320@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Will I use it? Absolutely not.

Do I hope that it gets used by others? Yeah, at least a bit. Because if Meta assigns more engineers to work on fedi tech like improving ActivityPub that would be a huge win for the fediverse in general. That assumes they actually contribute to open source, but Meta/FB actually has a reasonable track record there.

[–] loofkid@lemmy.loof.life 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d agree, except for this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

Seems more likely that they’ll end up harming the fediverse before they improve things for us.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Not touching that, nope.

[–] roxby@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Twitter never made sense to me, so threads won't either.

[–] ren@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Yes! BUTTTTT I have a master plan!!!

HERE ME OUT!

I'm on Instagram and have a bunch of followers, around 200K.

SO - My plan is to squat as the IG users pick up Threads. Most people will just follow the same people from IG (Meta encourages it and it fills your feed fast).

My follower count on Threads should grow just from that alone, right?

THEN - Facebook finally federates, right?

THEN! Facebook allows for account migration to Mastodon.

First..... I migrate my @renwillis@mstdn.social account to Threads.

Finally.... Immediately migrate all my followers from Threads back to mstdn.social.

Suddenly potentially 200K are following a Mastodon account!!! MWUH-HAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm torn between "Fuck no!" and "What? Seriously?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fxl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. I haven't logged in to Fuckerbergs's shit over the last 2 years, not about to start now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Marxine@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't join even if paid to do so.

I'd take the money and scram.

[–] Alperto@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

After reading another post where it was shown all the private information the app requires, I’ll never even be close to it (a quick resume: location, device information, user profiles on other apps, payment information, even health information).

Edit: found a link (it’s a meme, but the screenshot shows what i’m referring to): https://lemm.ee/post/653305

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Privacy-wise, I already use Facebook, WhatsApp, Messenger and Instagram, and I'm pretty sure that Mark Zuckerberg knows everything that he'd ever want to know about me. I largely believe in the conspiracy theory that Meta actively listens in on users in some way to serve them ads and targeted content, even if the evidence is circumstantial at best.

Despite this, would I still use Threads? Probably not.

Microblogging isn't my thing. 140 characters is nowhere near enough space to articulate your thoughts and it feels like the site was originally designed around SMS text message limitations more than anything. I also don't like how the only way you can get any genuine interaction on places like Twitter or even Mastodon is to be a celebrity.

I do agree that we should collectively defederate Threads much in the same way that everybody on the fediverse collectively blacklisted Gab, not necessarily as a fuck-you to Zuckerberg, but because a flood of Instagram normies would completely cripple other instances with traffic.

[–] Gruntyfish@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not

[–] LollyActionGinger@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Hard pass. I’m shit tired of being advertised to and packaged as a product at the same time

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 1 year ago
[–] Sweetroll789@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Big fat no from me. I don’t want to see ads in my sleep.

[–] frost_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I have 0 interest in giving any information to the Zucc

[–] ChilledFlames@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Nah, don't want meta to collect even more data about me than before.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Literally the first time I am hearing about this now.

I hate FB but I think I hate Elon even more, so if Thread kills off Twitter that would be great.

But I have my doubts.

Everyone already hates all the bullshit that FB does and flying under the Meta banner changes nothing. The tech/young/hip demographics needed to get a platform going seem to be distancing themselves away from FB as being an "uncool" company.

Meta has alienated so many people that they are going to have a hard time breeaking into new product categories because people just don't want to use their products unless essentially forced to. Look at their VR headsets. From a hardware perspective they really are quite good, but so many stupid, stupid policy decisions (such as needing a FB account originally) that folks rather do without than deal with them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

no definitely not installing it or opening an account.

I'm not against federation tho, I'd be in favour of showing people you can get all the same content through another channel. defederating means that people will have to use it if there's content from someone they like on there. I don't want to give people a reason to install that shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lancerrx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[–] InLikeClint@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Fuck everything that is facebook

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›