approval for a railroad project
Let's see...
that would carry crude oil
😭 what the heck
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
82 points (98.8% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5238 readers
749 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, they're trying to extract a bunch of tar, which requires enormous energy inputs to turn into a useful fuel, and which is tough to transport by pipeline.
It really feels like SCOTUS noticed that environmentally-conscious people are advocating for expansion of rail, and will now rule in favour of this project just to spite them.
The bait was real. I knew there was a catch, i just knew it. But I let my guard down anyway.
They're all about immanentizing the eschaton.
Oh, the irony of these christofascist lickspittles using the SCOTUS to resurrect dead rulings for big oil payola, when they scream about “activist judges” ruling to preserve laws that preserve some person’s health or wellbeing…
The rail route they're trying to enable starts in rural east Utah, then heads into Colorado and travels mere feet away from the the Colorado river. Contamination of that water source would only affect Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, California, and Mexico. What could possibly go wrong?
I LOVE when Unelected Lifetime Officials decide to create their OWN Legislation! It's a good thing NONE of these Unelected Lifetime Officials have any Conflicts of Interest!
Yeah there’s no other energy source in rural eastern Utah.
Mmmm.
See, they get almost no sun there, the poor guys. Thank god there's the oil industry and their ~~bribed~~ politicians pushing their 100% environmentally friendly solutions for their energy that definitely will not be obsolete the minute they are finished!
/s if it isn't clear enough
The issue at the Supreme Court is whether the agency should have weighed the potential environmental harm of the railroad’s main cargo, both where the oil is drilled in Utah and refined on the Gulf Coast, when it has no regulatory authority over oil production.
I'm not as down on SCOTUS as the rest of you, excepting Thomas and Alito. They've either ruled or refused a couple of dozen cases that could be seen as liberal wins. But this one sounds like a slam dunk for the railroad.
Sounds like an agency regulating a thing they don't have authority over. This Court will overrule them in a heartbeat.