this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3086 readers
190 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So there are cheaper generics available and they are forcing people to go without?

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 7 months ago

Sort off. But much more complex.

  1. not all drugs have generic options. This would only solve a % of the issues. As many newer groups can still be under patient. Sometimes for more the 40 years after discovery.

Lets just say pharmaceutical companies find lawyers a valid expense.

  1. but more to the point. Even generics only help if we can get them. Our NHS has restrictions on what they can charge the gov to supply certain drugs. All calculated on global prices. But when it costs more for a company in the EU to send drugs to the UK. Then to send those same drugs to an EU nation. Guess who gets them first.

So the issue is more about a price cut obsessed government being willing to admit their choices on how to implement brexit. Had a cost.

Not a very politically effective thing for them to do.

So they shove head in the sand and shout nope its down to the pharmacists to find better deals.

And this has been happening since before covid.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Drug shortages are a “new normal” in the UK and are being exacerbated by Brexit, a report by the Nuffield Trust health thinktank has warned.

A dramatic recent spike in the number of drugs that are unavailable has created serious problems for doctors, pharmacists, the NHS and patients, it found.

Nicola Swanborough, head of external affairs at the Epilepsy Society, said: “Our helpline has been inundated with calls from desperate people who are having to travel miles, often visiting multiple pharmacies to try and access their medication.”

But Britain’s departure from the EU in 2020 has significantly aggravated the problem, laid bare the “fragility” of the country’s medicines supply networks and could lead to the situation worsening, the report said.

That has forced the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) to agree to pay above the usual price for drugs that are scarce to try to ensure continuity of supply far more often than it used to.

Ministers should agree to pay more for generic medicines, which are usually much cheaper than branded ones, to help tackle shortages, Hill added.


The original article contains 942 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!