this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
211 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19090 readers
5225 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So you're telling me the lie he told is a lie? I'm shocked.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

No.

They are very specifically, very spinelessly not telling you the lie he told is a lie.

Isn’t that right, nbcnews.

Can’t call a liar a liar, or a rapist a rapist, or a failed coup-plotter a traitor, or a fraud a fraud. Can you, nbcnews. Noooooo. No, not unless they’re, y’know, black or something.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Nothing Trump says is supported by data.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago

Came here to say exactly this.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately, it doesn't matter. His word is law to his supporters and congressional Republicans.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Ok but is anything that Trump ever claims really supported by data?

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Where is that Guatemalan migrant caravan that was supposed to show up and "tek er jerbs" around the last election time?

[–] TrivialAntics@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It'll be back, we just need to get closer to November. That's when they need it in the news most.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Trump's claims ~~of a migrant crime wave~~ are not supported ~~by national data~~

[–] mySFWaccount@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 months ago

Thank you. I came looking for this exact comment.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is anything he says supprted by anything?

Supported by his voters

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — When Donald Trump speaks at the southern border in Texas on Thursday, you can expect to hear him talk about “migrant crime,” a category he has coined and defined as a terrifying binge of criminal activity committed by undocumented immigrants spreading across the country.

But despite the former president’s campaign rhetoric, expert analysis and available data from major-city police departments show that despite several horrifying high-profile incidents, there is no evidence of a migrant-driven crime wave in the United States.

Ousey notes the emotional toll these incidents have taken and how they can inform public perception, saying, “They can be really egregious acts of criminality that really draw lots of attention that involve somebody who happens to be an immigrant.

“Democrat cities purposefully do not document when crimes are committed by illegal immigrants, because they don’t want American citizens to know the truth about the dangerous impact Joe Biden’s open border is having on their communities,” Karoline Leavitt, Trump campaign press secretary, said in a statement.

The data is incomplete on how many crimes each year are committed by migrants, primarily because most local police don’t record immigration status when they make arrests.

But the studies that have been done on this, most recently by the University of Wisconsin-Madison, show that in Texas, where police do record immigration status, migrants commit fewer crimes per capita.


The original article contains 899 words, the summary contains 222 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!