this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
566 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37736 readers
355 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] coderipper@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The big issue for me is waterproofing. It seems that this would present a significant opportunity for fluid ingress. Personally, that is a design trade I would be unwilling to make.

[–] withersailor@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Phones had removable batteries and were waterproof. It was all marketing saying they changed for waterproofing.

They changed to increase their profits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wim@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Does this also apply to EVs? Would be really nice if we could save such large and expensive appliances from planned obsolecense.

[–] corporateHippie@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Accidental double comment amd 503 error when trying to delete..

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›