this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
46 points (96.0% liked)

World News

32513 readers
569 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ComRed2@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Cucker was in danger of sliding into irrelevance after the fox news firing. His twitter show was a failure too. He knew he needed to do something big to stay relevant and this is that thing. He'll be able to ride it for a while but after it fizzles out, he'll need to come up with the next attention-grabbing scheme. It's all about keeping the grift going. He doesn't give a shit about any of this, It's all about the money and the fame.

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Tucker should be sanctioned for being a bowtie wearing shit eating reactionary named "Tucker" first and foremost.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

It’s amazing what lengths Carlson goes to in order to stay relevant. Sad, really.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My favorite thing about the interview is when he literally told Putin to "shut the fuck up and get back to the script" when he started talking about the Nazis being bad. Like shit man, if you didn't have the soft power you had I don't think you'd be leaving Russia after that one.

It was wild in general seeing Putin as not being the most wicked man in the room, which isn't hard when the other person is probably one of the most notorious neo-nazi propagandists in America who literally quit their golden job because they asked him to hide the racism a bit better.

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If Assange and Snowden can't come back, why cucker?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I always love how quickly the liberal mask falls off. The west is all about freedom, democracy, and free speech, until it's something the lib mainstream doesn't like to hear. It's quite telling you're not asking why Assange and Snowden are being prosecuted for revealing what they revealed, but you're upset that this isn't happening more.

Turns out that those who label Communists as tankies and authoritarians are well-aware of the necessity to suppress divergent viewpoints. Freedom of expression is limited to ideas that align with the liberal narrative; when faced with opinions they deem detrimental, liberals demand cancellation, imprisonment, or even death for the proponents.

The real disagreement liberals have with the Communists is over what set of ideas has merit. When liberals screech about authoritarianism what they're really saying is that it's their ideology that's being suppressed.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

How long before he announces a Trump interview as well. Mule transporting information between Russians.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago

Shame. He could have taken out 2 fashists with 1 press of a button...

[–] n0m4n@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

I have followed 'news' from Russian outlets such as RT and Sputnik, being recast as Right wing talking points within hours. This is not just recent, it has been going on for years. Hamilton68 documents examples. The parallels of this propaganda being sown to the lies dispensed to Ukraine to sow dissention is obvious. It is a cheap warfare, and it works. Tucker was and is in the trade of packaging Russian propaganda as news. He should be labeled as such. Carlson was discredited and fired by Fox. Spreading lies, admitting to doing so on archived tapes, and iirc, sexual harassment was in his part of the discovery on Fox's $780M settlement. In short, Tucker Carlson is on record for knowingly spreading lies, for personal monetary benefit. This is more of the same. I hope every person watches Carlson, knowing that Carlson reports what enriches him, not truth. Carlson has a transparent agenda. The unanswered question is who pays Carlson. That will be obvious by who's boots that Carlson's reports shine.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

This is in part one of those situations where your argument amounts to question-begging. The reason being, just as a test: What if Russia was on the correct side of the war, would this still be coherent? Is there any contradiction in these Russian publicity outlets publishing correct information that is then opportunistically used by the rival party to the current US administration to discredit the latter?

If you already assume slava ukra'ini and that reactionaries have some magical inability to say things that are true, you can make a coherent story, but I would argue that the antithesis is at least as coherent a story.

I'm sure RT, etc. also publish bullshit that is also used by the right just as readily, but imo the Russian center-right can get by on policy wrt Ukraine by simply reporting facts faithfully, because theirs is a position [shared by much of the Russian left as well] that is only more justified as historical context increases and actors are more closely scrutinized. I was objectively late to the party when, in 2018, I was reading about the CIA backing Azov, but still I saw reality completely recast leading up to the invasion and thereby I had some advantage over the liberals who seem to believe that Ukraine is Palestine despite the fact that it's Ukraine slaughtering ethnic minorities.

It doesn't help that Ukraine can't seem to find pictures of its military that don't include fascist symbols, or that they absolutely wear their banderite bullshit on their sleeve if you actually listen to them speak. You can just report on these things faithfully and make the Ukrainian government and especially its military look monstrous to many viewers.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›