this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
389 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59092 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

for context, that's 0.04% of the profits Amazon earned in France alone (€9B) in 2022.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's much less than paying for a parking ticket for a private citizen (cost relative to income).

Basically a mockery of the entire thing.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago

MAKE FINES HURT.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's France and the EU on one side, American business practice on the other.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't want to start a political drama but.... What's the French or EU equivalent and why isn't it as popular? Or is it? I honestly don't know but keep asking the question why is Amazon (or Google for that matter) so dominant in their markets even outside the US?

[–] adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev 6 points 9 months ago

For all the same reasons it's dominant in the US?

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Higher barrier to entry and there's honestly just too much money in USA (I don't know how else to say it lol, hope you understand). The amount of efforts required to be even considered underdog against Amazon is stupendously high.

[–] sizzling@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

In the Netherlands we have bol.com that is generally more popular for online shopping, but in other countries amazon entered the market pretty early.

I've only tried Amazon a few times, but it doesn't really seem like a quality service so who knows 🤷

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Permanently Deleted

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

They'll have made that back several times over in the time it took them to send them the fee

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, however will Amazon recover from having to pay the equivalent of checks notes a cinema ticket?

[–] Ibex@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They already put ads on Prime Video now and charge $2.99 a month to remove them. Expect it to be higher in a few months if they have to pay this.

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Expect it to be higher in a few months ~~if they have to pay this.~~

they will charge the maximum amount they can, regardless of costs. they always have.

[–] TxzK@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

'tis but a business expense

[–] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Except that they will obviously fine them again and again and again until they comply.

The max fine that can be imposed in such circumstances are enormous.

It also scares other companies from attempting the same bullshit.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The French Data Protection Authority, also known by its acronym CNIL, said the system allowed managers at Amazon France Logistique to track employees so closely that it resulted in multiple breaches of the European Union’s stringent privacy rules, called the General Data Protection Regulation.

“We strongly disagree with the CNIL’s conclusions, which are factually incorrect, and we reserve the right to file an appeal,” Amazon said.

“Warehouse management systems are industry standard and are necessary for ensuring the safety, quality and efficiency of operations and to track the storage of inventory and processing of packages on time and in line with customer expectations.”

The watchdog’s investigation focused on Amazon employees’ use of handheld barcode scanners to track packages at various points as they move through the warehouse, such as putting them in crates or packing them for delivery.

Seattle-based Amazon uses the system to manage its business and meet performance targets, but the regulator said it’s different from traditional methods for monitoring worker activity and puts them under “close surveillance” and “continuous pressure.”

The system is used to measure employee productivity as well as “periods of inactivity,” but under EU privacy rules, “it was illegal to set up a system measuring work interruptions with such accuracy, potentially requiring employees to justify every break or interruption,” the watchdog said.


The original article contains 329 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 34%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!