If the rolling wooden variant still turns out not to be enough, I might need to source a real live duck. 🦆 Not sure how patient that would be at listening to me explaining code though. 🤔

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So rude for not dropping the link for that duck in the post tsk tsk tsk

[–] isti115@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, I'd suggest asking around your nearest toddler, that's how I managed to borrow this one. 😀 Probably it has been inherited through several generations, that might explain it's wisdom!

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My rubber duck is a Darkwing Duck figurine. He usually does the trick.

[–] isti115@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Whoa, I just checked out some images, that one is on another level as well for sure. 😀 If he's as good at fighting bugs as criminals, you're in good ~~hands~~ wings!

[–] jwt@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ah typescript properties possibly undefined, eh? My advice would be to sprinkle some more question marks on your code.

[–] isti115@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thanks for the advice, but lo and behold, the issue was actually caused by a newly introduced generic parameter not being defined after a dependency update. 🙃 Oh, the wonders of the JS/TS ecosystem...

[–] mrkite@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Nah.. wrap entire templates in @if statements.

[–] autokludge@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

[–] brokenlcd@feddit.it 3 points 10 months ago

I raise chickens in my garden; I'll make do

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

nice piantor ;)

[–] NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world 0 points 10 months ago

I mean you could always substitute a witch if you are unable to source the live duck...