this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
2050 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
3418 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sounds desperate. I'd be selling google stock if I had any, are they really so dependent on loans that interest rates are killing them or is this more AI fuelled bullshit?

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd be selling google stock if I had any

If you did, you probably wouldn't. Unfortunate as it may be, Google is an unfathomably massive business that continues to generate value for their shareholders. Any stock sales by an average individual as a protest are meaningless. Even if you sold a million dollars worth of stock, it wouldn't mean anything to them.

Alphabet's market cap is currently 1.7 trillion dollars. With a T. $1,700,000,000,000.

We can extrapolate from there just how much money would need to move for them to pay even a little attention. For example, $170 million dollars is just 0.01%. Granted a move that large from a single investor might cause a brief drop as others sell as well, but investors are just gonna buy it all up at a discount. They'll call it a market correction and keep on going.

I'm not saying you should just roll over and accept their shit, but money is not the way to do it unless you can move more than a billion dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A2PKXG@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Antitrust lawsuit, here we go!

[–] umbraroze@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

If Chrome is known for one thing, it's absurd User-Agent strings. Why not make it even more absurd???

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 (Ahahaha; Fuck you Google; This is actually) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/119.0

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems that FF is not the target:

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/17zq1jj/youtube_is_reportedly_slowing_down_videos_for/ka0utpq/

Why would they spend resources to enrage 3% (at most) of their users?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] moormaan@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

I'm A YouTube Premium subscriber, and I've been noticing this delay on my TV for a few days now - a very noticeable, long pause when opening the home screen until the thumbnails are loaded. I'll explicitly check other places too now, I'm not sure if it's also happening in Firefox for me.

[–] SacrificedBeans@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I noticed a delay on Opera with uBlock. I attributed it to invisible fights between the adblock and youtube. But idk if that's relevant, I think Opera GX is chromium based.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Oh, this is about the delay if you're using a full adblocker? I'd assumed this was about the awful choppy rendering performance I get in FF Mobile when it's just starting up a vid (which smooths out after about 5 seconds). I just use FF on Android to be able to run YT vids in the background or with my phone-screen locked.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

i was wondering about this! very dumb.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Honestly thought this was a glitch because it has happened before where youtube would freeze, usually from some backend error, and the whole page wouldn't load.

Really getting desperate lol.

[–] erranto@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They have all the decision makers in their payrolls. They will stop at nothing !

[–] HopelessDemigod@mstdn.social 7 points 1 year ago

@db0

This is starting to get into the antitrust arena. DOJ needs to take action.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’ve been noticing a lot of ‘interesting’ behavior with data-hungry websites when I use more privacy-focused measures lately.

Gmail logs me out of Safari at least weekly now for no apparent reason, other than to inconvenience me.
Gmail also refuses to deliver any emails forwarded through hide my email. They simply do not arrive, not even to spam. I had to start using another email service for hide my email. (Additionally, every email I get from Apple gets tagged with a phishing warning, which is just petty and funny.)
Facebook sends an email every time I log in (once or twice a month) to tell me that Firefox is suspicious because I use ad-blockers and private windows.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

Did not notice it today, but I am running ublock origin and they got my back.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm not seeing any delays, 5 second or otherwise, when using Firefox.

[–] 271apple@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›