this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
254 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37643 readers
252 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

Tough shit.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 11 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryTesla says it has received requests for information and subpoenas from the US Department of Justice related to potential personal benefits violations, the advertised range of its vehicles and personnel decisions.

The Wall Street Journal in September reported that federal prosecutors are investigating perks provided to Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk going back as far back as 2017, including a project described as a glass house for Musk.

Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Tesla had created a special “diversions team” to avoid dealing with complaints from customers about their vehicle ranges.

The filing warned of “the possibility of a material adverse impact on our business” should the government pursue an enforcement action.

The subpoenas add to a mounting number of government probes into the electric-vehicle maker.

In September, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Tesla alleging that it has been “tolerating widespread and ongoing racial harassment of its Black employees” at its Fremont, California, plant.


Saved 21% of original text.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

You gave warning a whole new meaning.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago
[–] H4Heights@mstdn.social 3 points 11 months ago

@Five I see no downside to the Incel’s car business being investigated.

[–] voron@mstdn.party 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@Five I get a kick out of the #liberal people still defending #tesla

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

I get a kick out of liberal people defending liberals.

[–] aral@mastodon.ar.al 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] noodlejetski@masto.ai 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] _L1vY_@mstdn.social 1 points 11 months ago

@noodlejetski @aral @Five The cutest version 😆

[–] Yamatsuka13@mas.to 1 points 11 months ago

@noodlejetski @aral @Five reminds me of Reservoir Dogs.

[–] ianbetteridge@writing.exchange 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@aral @Five How many billions did deliberately making misleading claims cost VW, again?

[–] fancysandwiches@urbanists.social 1 points 11 months ago

@ianbetteridge @aral @Five For those wondering just like me, the answer is a bit complicated, but in terms of settlements paid:

On 28 June 2016, Volkswagen agreed to pay $15.3 billion to settle the various public and private civil actions in the United States, the largest settlement ever of an automobile-related consumer class action in United States history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal#Private_actions

[–] pellechristensen@mastodon.social 2 points 11 months ago

@Five Cry me a river Elon Musk

[–] catarinac@masto.pt 2 points 11 months ago

@Five hahahahahahahahahaha, we wouldn't want that 😄

[–] Penguinflight@mastodon.online 1 points 11 months ago
[–] JamesBazan@mastodon.coffee 1 points 11 months ago

@Five like his cars, Elon comes up short.

[–] riggbeck@mastodon.social 1 points 11 months ago

@Five

As the saying goes, "tough shit."

[–] mina@berlin.social 1 points 11 months ago

@Five

The SEC might also look into the question, whether repeated false claims about Tesla's self-driving capabilities had an impact on the company's share price.

[–] metalpoetnl@metalhead.club 1 points 11 months ago

@Five I feel like that's only possible if they actually did ...

[–] Christo@mastodonapp.uk 1 points 11 months ago

@Five
Musk managed that mayerial adverse impact on our business on his own!

[–] voron@mstdn.party 1 points 11 months ago

@Five lying is another word for marketing

[–] dimi@techforgood.social 1 points 11 months ago
[–] IzzyOnDroid@floss.social 1 points 11 months ago

@Five So put into 5 words it's Tesla admitting:"Every single word is true"? I've no idea why else it should have "adverse impact". And if so, it SHOULD have that impact – to keep others at bay and protect those who're not billionaire man-babies.

[–] f800gecko@mastodon.online 1 points 11 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›