Comradeship // Freechat

Just Capital right now. Finished the Roman portion of Hudson's Antiquity - highly recommend this if you're into pre-capitalist history or if you are interested in debt.

"Knight without a call sign"

This weekend I started Naomi and Natalie Evans, The Mixed-Race Experience: Reflections and Revelations on Multiracial Identity. It's good so far. Short paras. Lots of empty space due to paragraph breaks. Plenty of headings. Makes it very easy to read.

It's not a 'radical' book. I don't think I'm going to come across any references to Fanon. But I get the sense they're hiding their power level. There's been a bit of a boom in publishing 'anti racism' books and while I've learned something from the few that I've read, I've not been blown away. This one's good.

I'd recommend this one for what I've read so far. It's practical. There's some interview/(auto)biographical work about what it's like to be mixed and grow up in a while household/area for example. And some great observations about different kinds of microaggressions.

It's a bit more like Reni Eddo-Lodge and Akala (both of whom are cited). With all four authors you get the impression they're trying to lead you to the edge of liberalism with a question: if liberalism and capitalism won't work, what then? They leave it open for the reader to conclude with anti-capitalism without stating it. The second interviewee in The Mixed-Race Experience, for instance, seems to be speaking in coded dialectics and they let that come through.

Whereas a few others, like Jeffrey Boakye, are rooted in liberal thought. Capitalist realism kind of stuff. Not to be snuffed. But some of these up and coming authors don't want us to stage a revolution and their books are promoted to the heavens as providing a cure to an ill world. The world is ill, to be sure. But the liberal solution isn't viable.

On my walks, I've been listening to Galeano's Open Veins of Latin America in Spanish. Does that count as reading? It's hard going for me. My Spanish isn't good enough so I'm not sure how much I'm getting. The only thing I'm really getting are the pronouns and something called 'hipotesi'? I don't think that's a word so I must me missing something.

The producers made a weird stylistic choice. Every so often the narrator says, 'nota de autor' and a number. But I'm entirely unsure whether the text that comes before or after this is the footnote. And I can't work out when the footnote ends and when the narrator goes back to the main text.

Would be helpful if he spoke it in a different voice. Or just ignored them. I've had to stop listening to other audio books because the narrator read the footnotes like this. They really need to find another way. They should be read as endnotes or something at the very end of the recording.

I might have a look at Nina Burton. Have you heard of Robert Macfarlane? They sound similar.

A bunch of social science journal articles

I am a strange loop https://archive.org/details/iamstrangeloop00hofs

"In deep shift" I am trying hard to be more disciplined and study well.

Pablo Neruda autobiography in Spanish, to improve my fluency and he's a Chilean Poet who was a socialist, his life is fascinating.

A jazz theory book, i am trying very hard to learn but I need to practice more, hence why I'm reading the first book.

I have more books I'm ready to take on like The 48 laws of power not because I want to use it on others but because I wanna be aware of how others use this mentality. But I haven't started.

I have a huge list of theory books I need to begin. I was reading Stalins book the principles of Lenin, I never got around to continuing past the first part but I loved it. I read Maos little red book briefly at a friend's house that is a very captivating read, I'm looking to get it.