this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
359 points (97.6% liked)

internet funeral

6905 readers
3 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

In that order, too.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not bold. Not even italic or underlined...

[–] kirby@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~Mankind~~ will die

[–] swnt@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The funny thing, is that it actually never makes sense to "predict humanities demise", as noone will be able to witness your prediction coming true. You won't be able to reap any benefits of your true prediction, so you might as well bet on survival

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Eh? Predictions aren't always about reaping benefits. Not every prediction comes with a bet that you can win. Sometimes it's just what you think is the most likely outcome, whether you have a stake in the outcome or not.

[–] zemja@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

There's a 100% chance that humanity will die, eventually. We surely can't survive until the end of time. Even if we could, you wouldn't be able to witness that either.

with sufficient automation, the order might even be correct