this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
856 points (98.0% liked)

World News

32363 readers
480 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atk007@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

That's one way to defeat Russia. Have them eat garbage food.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

this is genocide

[–] Historical_General@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My condolences to the Russians.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Destraight@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (36 children)

Burger King will never see a single cent from me, fucking traitors

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Extend that to all companies and capitalism is over party.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] whygohomie@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

If BK food in the US is any indication of the quality in Russia, let them stay open. Worst of the worst as far as fast food goes. It's economic warfare with none of the war crimes! /s

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They're making too much money. Corporations are not beholden to nations, silly Americans.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Can Burger King pull out of the US first? Absolutely the worst fast food chain ever. The only reason anybody goes to BK is if McDonald's is on fire.

[–] Critical_Insight@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Personally I prefer Burger King over McDonald's. Haven't been since the first BK opened in my city.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


David Shear, RBI's president, said in March 2022 that Burger King's main operator in Russia had "refused" to shut the outlets following the first attacks on Ukraine.

Steven Tian, part of a team of researchers at Yale University who track what companies have done in response to the Ukraine war, argued using franchise agreements as an "excuse" was a "convenient smokescreen".

Mark Dixon, founder of the Moral Rating Agency, which campaigns against firms doing business in Russia, called for RBI to disclose what specific actions it had taken in its attempts to leave.

David Bond, partner at law firm Fieldfisher, said RBI's 15% stake meant it could not simply "dictate terms" to its fellow shareholders to require them to close Burger King branches.

He also suggested companies that franchise out their brands would be reluctant to simply walk away from deals as it could lead to "dire consequences", including being sued for breach of contract, as well as reputational damage.

But he said consequences aside, there was nothing stopping RBI from terminating the franchise arrangement if it was adamant it wanted to do so, though added it might not result in the Burger King brand ceasing to exist in Russia.


The original article contains 671 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Borkingheck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

On all the shorts etc showing sanction life in Russia, not one has mentioned burger King is still there.

[–] MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

BK in Russia? Smh I thought biological warfare was illegal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HowMany@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Their burgers are trash compared to what they used to be - so fine - feed the Russians trash. About not keeping their word to leave Russia... does anyone here believe anything corporate has to say?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›