this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
115 points (96.0% liked)

Linux

48133 readers
1170 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I made a post a few days ago asking your opinion on Manjaro and it was very mixed, with a slightly negative overall opinion. I heard some recommend EndeavourOS instead and did some online research and it seems to be pretty solid and not have the repository problem that Manjaro has.

Just for context I am a Linux noob and have only used Mint for about the past six months. While I don't have any major complaints, I am looking to explore more distros and the Arch repository with its rolling releases. I am not a huge fan of how certain packages on apt are a few years old and outdated. However, I also don't have the time to be always configuring my OS and just want something that works well out of the box.

Is EndeavourOS a solid choice?

(page 2) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alfredalpaca@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Your issue seems to be outdated packages, so I wouldn't recommend distro hopping(especially to something arch based) for just that reason. Look into workarounds for those packages in mint itself. In the worst case scenario there's also the option of compiling from source.

I wouldn't recommend distro hopping to arch without some high level understanding of the different moving parts of the OS. EndeavourOS has given me almost no issues but when things break(like grub a while back) you have to be OK with touching parts of the system that just work and are taken for granted on distros like mint. It's why I don't consider anything arch based friendly to a "noob user".

If you're a "noob user" who wants to learn more you can try endeavourOS, that's kind of the spirit of it.

[–] lastjunkieonearth@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

Been using it the last 2 years and I find it great. Before that it was Mint about 5 years and PopOS about 2. Don't think I will ever go back to a Debian based distro

[–] atlas@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I had already used other linux distros for a while but never arch (or arch based systems), so I decided to give EndeavourOS a try and I am really liking it, it's pretty solid for me. I am currently using it with Gnome in my personal laptop and I really just needed to configure gnome (my extensions and such), nothing about endeavour especifically.

That being said, EndeavourOS does not ship with a graphical package management tool by default so it's up to you to choose one or just use the command line to manage your packages (if you're new to Linux it can sound complicated at first but it's quite simple when you get used to it).

There are other solid and "noob-friendly" rolling-release distros like Fedora and OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, but if you want arch, EndeavourOS is an excellent choice.

[–] kixik@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One thing I don't know about any Arch based distributions is how about configurations. On Arch, the default configurations for some packages, whether do not work out of the box, or are not the safest configs. Whether while installing new SW, or while updating, there's a good level of involvement particularly with configurations.

Apart from installation, which in rolling release distributions it might be about a one time thing per device, configuration might become a burden for new users.

I believe Manjaro (I've never used it) comes with some sort of sane configs that work out of the box for most users, unless when looking for particular tweaks, or so I read in the past. But Manjaro has fallen really down on people's preferences. If EndeavourOS uses Arch repos, I'm wondering if there's any difference, once installed, between maintaining Arch and maintaining EndeavourOS. Just by how it sounds, it's the same thing, a lot of wikies readings (particularly when not familiar with the SW and how to make it work, there's SW that works without particular configs, but there are some that don't really work nicely out of the box on Arch), having to config lots of things to install stuff and make it work, and then be careful on upgrades about configs changes. It doesn't look like EndeavourOS makes this any simpler, and just having some extra stuff, but not having their own repos, where they package SW with curated configs, then I see no purpose other than to make the Arch install easier, which now a days have alternative ways to do so.

Can some one please clarify on configs, and maintenance in general, for EndeavourOS? Is there an Arch based distribution really making this easier on new gnu+linux users, who are are really not used to deal with any of that? TBH, depending on Arch packages repositories sounds hard to achieve any of that...

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“ Can some one please clarify on configs, and maintenance in general, for EndeavourOS?”

EndeavourOS is Arch with a nice installer and decent default configs. It is super easy to get to a nice, fully configured desktop. Once installed, it is basically Arch Linux.

[–] kixik@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was afraid so... I'm OK with Arch, and I actually use Artix (to avoid systemd), but I know there are people who don't want, neither can do configs, nor maintain them on upgrades, as it's a typical thing on Arch, and most distros based on it... So I'm afraid there's really no Arch based distribution for those kind of users, and EndeavourOS seems no exception. Actually if one really wants typical Arch after installation, there are alternatives to the Arch ISO, no need for other distribution for that I'd suggest...

It'd be nice to have an Arch based distribution equivalent to Mint, so maintenance is really minimal on new users, and users with no tech abilities. Something rolling release is actually something welcome for such users, since having to upgrade on major versions is not always as clean, even for people with some experience.

At any rate, thanks for the clarification.

[–] JavaHead@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I went to EndeavourOS with i3WM (from dual boot Windows/ Ubuntu) and have been loving the experience. It's really helped push my boundaries with learning Linux.

[–] mintycactus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That was the first distro switching from Mac. Obviously. Used for 5 days only. Everything is too simple to make it convinient and easy to use. Top taskbar is absolutly useless, yet takes some vert space. Replacing most default apps or try Mint? Mint was ok (BTW).

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Top taskbar? Are you sure you didn't use the vanilla XFCE setup or GNOME? Mint sucks and has a bad track record.

[–] mintycactus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk how it should be called, there are Applications menu, time in the middle and various shit on the right. This taskbar does absolutly nothing in OHH LOL in Elementary OS. My bad. I use cinnamon and taskbar is really more powerful, could be made similar to windows or xfce. I actually tried EndeavourOS live, but you can not see its cinnamon without installing it. Anyway I am curious what bad track record, I use Mint.

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Mint got hacked and bad ISOs got uploaded, oh and when I used mint, the upgrade from 19.1 to 19.3 didn't work. Unfixable broken packages.

[–] Carter@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago

I don't really understand the need for it. I'd rather just use Arch.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›