this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2023
73 points (100.0% liked)
Lemmy
12538 readers
7 users here now
Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.
For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As average monitor resolution grows slowly over time, the average user interface scales up to match the size of the monitor, to the point where it becomes uncomfortably cramped to work in a window that's sized at or below half a monitor dimension.
Old operating systems used to operate entirely in a 400x300 pixel display (Mac OS 7 for example). A lot of modern applications probably won't even let you shrink the window that small.
Strange. I do it daily. Websites and apps all look as they are supposed to.
There's good reason no book or news paper has lines of text that are 150+ characters long. It makes it more difficult to read.
People use ultra-wide displays, where it only makes sense to use windows that are a 4th of the full width. They have the same vertical resolution, and it's functionally no different than using a half a 16/9 display.
It's something you'd get used to.
That looks hideous and distracting to me. I don't want my stuff that cluttered. I wouldn't be able to focus.
That I can understand. There are times when I get rid of other windows. But even then my focus window is rarely full screen. Mostly just when it's a movie.