this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
590 points (97.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20747 readers
735 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AcortexOT@lemmy.ca 116 points 1 year ago (49 children)

“Oh god, they will immediately be able to tell I am a fraud who has no idea what he’s doing when I tell them I use Ubuntu”

[–] alcasa@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 year ago (36 children)

Ubuntu is fine and I actually am on Ubuntu after using Arch for many years

[–] pazukaza@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (22 children)

I use Ubuntu. I think it's funny how Arch users immediately assume they know more about Linux than me because of my distro choice. My hobby is learning about Linux and I can do that perfectly from my Ubuntu machine.

I've used Arch in the past, and let me tell you, nothing crazy is going on in there.

Yes, Ubuntu sucks because they are forcing Snaps on people while snaps are slow as hell. Thankfully they haven't fully shoved snaps down our throats. If they don't make snaps faster before shoving them down my throat, I'll just distro hop. Probably to Debian. I love Debian.

[–] Snickers@on.syrma.cc 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I don’t get the complains about snap apps. My firefox opens near instant, even after a reboot. Maybe they fixed that with Lunar Lobster? That’s the first Ubuntu I installed on my PC since Ubuntu 9.04.

[–] pazukaza@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have installed Firefox in my machine and the difference is around 3 seconds.

For me, how my system feels is pretty important. If something isn't snappy, my stress levels start to rise. So those 3 seconds do make a difference. Some people might not care at all, which is understandable.

If you don't care, use it, enjoy it. You're free to pick what matches your priorities and preferences.

[–] Snickers@on.syrma.cc 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would care if it took 3s to start, after all I moved all my storage to NVMe for a reason. So I totally get why you would be annoyed with snaps, it’s just that in my experience there’s simply no noticeable startup time in 23.04, firefox opens in under a second. So they either fixed that in LL or you can outmuscle it with hardware, and I’m genuinely just curios which one it is.

[–] pazukaza@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I'm inclined for the second one. It would be pretty big news if they fixed it. My hardware is not bad but it isn't great either. I usually get laptops from my workplaces so my personal laptop is kinda old.

Keep in mind that a lot of people use Linux exactly because they don't have good hardware specs.

[–] zbecker@mastodon.zbecker.cc 1 points 1 year ago

@Snickers @pazukaza

It used to be slow to start. I think I heard >5 seconds, but I don't have any first hand experience.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)