this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
241 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21655 readers
7700 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Treasury Department said on Sunday it would not enforce an anti-money laundering law that obliges millions of business entities to disclose the identities of their real beneficial owners.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (10 children)

What problem was it trying to solve?

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago (9 children)

After subprime mortgages lead to yet another bubble bursting, it was thought that letting banks being responsible for our money was a bad idea. The whole idea behind crypto was thought you owned your money. Good idea in theory, but in practice it was not ready for prime... much like AI. (If ever)

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I had never heard that rationale for crypto before. It seems to be a really bad reason if I understand the logic. The value of the dollar was certainly impacted by the subprime crisis, but the dollar still had value being fiat currency issued by the US Government. Crypto currency is fiat currency issued by... a random dude (and in the case of Bitcoin, that nobody even knows). There is no value to crypto besides what someone else will give you for it. There's no intrinsic value to any of it. The rampant rug-pulls we see today in many cryptocurrencies are perfect evidence of this. Crypto "investing" seems to be predicated exclusively on the theory of the Greater Fool.

The whole idea behind crypto was thought you owned your money.

For those that really wanted that, didn't simply owning gold do that already? There's even intrinsic value to gold irrespective of which nation or national owns it in commercial, retail, and industrial applications.

The only value proposition I have ever seen for any crypto currency is avoiding national and international monetary export controls or cash repatriation.

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that was definitely the rationale. Satoshi added the message, “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks,” to the first Bitcoin block. In the early days, most of the community were Tea Party, Ron Paul, Paul Ryan, "abolish the Fed" types. There was a lot of anti-Fed propaganda floating around at that time. There was a big overlap with gold-bugs and Bitcoiners, and Bitcoin's "mining" decay curve was inspired by gold's.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)