this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
4449 readers
82 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"DSA can support a Revolutionary movement"
Press X to doubt
I think the term "can" is doing some heavy lifting. But I've met quite a few people from the YDSA which I'd easily call comrades. If individuals such as those continue to gain influence in the DSA I can definitely imagine them to be a much greater threat to the ruling class.
A good rule of thumb is assessing whether a local chapter us more focused on unionizing workplaces or of pushing through electoral reform. The chapters attempting the former are often more principled then the ones that spend their efforts doing the latter.