this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
90 points (88.8% liked)

Fediverse

28748 readers
22 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn't sure if !asklemmy@lemmy.world or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 2 weeks ago (22 children)

Haha yes, that's usually the issue. I talked down below about getting banned on slrpnk because of some things I was saying. The comment thread with all the highly-upvoted replies getting removed by the mod, and the downvoted stuff intact, is hilarious to me:

https://slrpnk.net/post/14823401/11895951

The same mod also had a habit of arguing with people, while removing their comments but leaving his own side of the argument intact. He's still a moderator there. In my opinion slrpnk needs to spend less time talking about anarchism and more time embodying anarchism.

[–] hono4kami@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

I use solarpunk and disappointed that it happened to you. I felt like solarpunk was the best instance Lemmy has, it feels like it has the least amount of echo chamber. Maybe I'm wrong.

I moderate my own community in solarpunk and I will try my best to not be like the moderator you talk about

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

I think you will see that these accusations have little substance, are taken out of context and argued in bad faith 🤷‍♂️

[–] hono4kami@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know you're not the same moderator they were talking about, but I just want to make you aware of this: https://ponder.cat/comment/1193264

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is not the first time this is discussed and bringing it up out of context is just bad-faith arguing.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I started out aiming to talk about the issue without reference to any past drama, but then someone specifically asked, "censorship from the mods, are you directly experiencing it? If yes, on which instance?" and specifically as related to anarchist points of view. Before today, I'd pretty much forgotten about the whole thing, but it's a pretty valid and interesting question and so I sent some of the citations about when it happened to me.

I can feel through the screen how much you would like to be able to just order me not to be able to discuss this anymore, since my view is officially "incorrect" according to you. Fortunately, that's not how it works.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Sorry but these age old troll tactics of baiting me into a response to these completely unfounded accusations will not work 😜

[–] hono4kami@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You keep dismissing said person as a troll, yet I feel like they have a point

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

They are misrepresenting the facts and arguing in bad faith. Very typical concern trolling.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Engage with the points or move on. This whole "i won't be baited" reeks of so much hubris and but hurt

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)