Am I the only one that doesn't really give a shit about ray tracing? For mediocre gains, you get a punch in the face on performance. I'll take 144Hz on a game over ray tracing any day.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Mmm I disagree completely. RT (when done well and done right) looks absolutely fantastic and worlds better than raster lighting. Play Cyberpunk 2077, compare Path Tracing on vs. no RT at all. Or Metro Exodus. Focus on reflections. Also RT shines more in motion than with static scenes. There are many games where RT doesn't do nuch or looks bad (Resident evil games) but in others it looks great. It really depends on the game. You can't judge this tech based on some bad implementations.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the first game I tried. Looks great, when it comes to a room and playing I find those details skip my brain and prefer smooth 144Hz instead

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

You may want to get an vision/neuro test :-/. Idk what else to say. It's a night and day difference for me.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lol

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 4 points 5 hours ago

Sorry, that was rude. Apologies.

load more comments (15 replies)