this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
166 points (94.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54539 readers
518 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

75% of the anti-piracy discussions I see rarely blame companies like Nintendo or Disney and always try to talk about how piracy is immoral, and you should feel "dirty" for doing it. My question is why do people seem to hate those who pirate more than the bad practices of mega-corporations or the fact that they don't want to preserve their media?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

And here's that exact superiority complex on display for all to see.

[–] Angel@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

How so? I literally stated that they have the exact same capacity as me to understand why veganism is a moral obligation. Such an understanding isn't hard to grasp, and I'm no ascended, especially enlightened person for being vegan. If I believed myself to be, I'd have no reason to hold others to the same standard. The incentive lies in the fact that carnism comes with victims; veganism isn't about me.

Regardless, this is an ad hominem and, as I stated, a thought-terminating cliché. It's a loophole to avoid engaging with ideas via focusing on the people expressing such ideas instead. Do you have any actual insight regarding the assertions I'm making or is it just cope?

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

they have the exact same capacity as me to understand why veganism is a moral obligation.

This is a "begging the question" logical fallacy

this is an ad hominem and, as I stated, a thought-terminating cliché.

veganism is a moral obligation

carnism comes with victims

is it just cope?

What thoughtful discussion arises from someone repeatedly telling you that they're morally superior to you for choosing one specific diet over another? You're projecting here.

I have no issues with someone being vegan, but I take issue with self-righteous people such as yourself who can't help but talk about how superior their choices are.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I have no issues with someone not supporting animal torture, but I take issue with self-righteous people such as yourself who can't help but talk about how superior their choices are.

There is no functional difference between your original text and my bolded replacement. To be a carnist is to, through your actions, support animal torture.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hmm. Claims to not support animal torture yet joins hexbear and tortures all of us mammals on Lemmy any time one of you "writes" a comment. I'm seeing a disconnect in your reasoning here...

[–] Are_Euclidding_Me@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

This is such a shitty "joke". Fucking hell. I hope you experience even half of the suffering a dairy cow experiences during their life. You won't, because the world isn't fair, but if I could imprison you and exploit your reproductive system until you're too old and worn out to be worthwhile and then kill you, I would do so.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

Carnists don't count

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)