MTG

1905 readers

54 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

andrew@mtgzone.com

mike@mtgzone.com

Stealth rule change announced in the Foundations mechanics article: no more choosing blocker order (magic.wizards.com)

submitted 1 week ago by silverchase@sh.itjust.works to c/mtg@mtgzone.com

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The announcement of this rule change with examples are at the bottom of the article. To summarize:

In the current rules, if you attack with a creature and it gets multi-blocked, once your opponent locks in their blocks, you choose the order of blockers immediately. During the combat damage step, you must assign enough (big asterisk on "enough") damage on the first creature before you can assign damage on the next.

Starting with Foundations, you don't choose an order for the blockers. During the combat damage step, you will just distribute damage however you want.

This weakens multi-blocking as a defensive option.

We will one day speak of blocker order like we do damage on the stack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] keksbaecker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Deciding on how to assign the damage without the defending player being able to intervene seems okay to me, but I am really confused why they removed the requirement to assign lethal damage.

But maybe I have, you know … plans and would rather deal 3 damage to the 6/6 and 2 damage to the 4/4. That's okay, too.

This really feels unnecessary to me.

[–] meant2live218@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Bam, Brotherhood's End. Or something like that.