this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
316 points (99.1% liked)

Opensource

1367 readers
20 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Just to clarify, licenses are free software or open source when they fit the definition of those terms, aka the 4 freedoms and whatever open source requires, but both require being able to use the software without restrictions. So this isnt open source.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (12 children)

This is an opinion which is not universally shared. Even Stallman doesn’t agree with this definition.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Anyone who disagrees ought to go get their own term rather than appropriating "Open Source" and/or "Free Software".

I've heard "source available" used.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"free software" very clearly means some software you can use for free (which this isn't), but "open source" very clearly means openly accessible source code, which this is.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

"Free Software" very clearly means this, and "Open Source" very clearly means this.

Again, get your own terms. "Freeware" and "source available" are just sitting right there.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)