this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
328 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

58451 readers
5550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Built on unearned hype.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can short something with $1. It's just not enough to affect the value itself. You also don't technically need any money at all, the point of a basic short is to profit off selling borrowed stock after all.

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You definitely do need money. No broker is going to let you short without collateral, and you're going to be paying interest for the duration of your short position beside any fees/commission.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's fair, but let's not pretend there aren't brokers that just run a credit check below a certain amount and leave it at that.

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe if you have a super low cap, high fees, and they automatically close your position at a pretty conservative point. But that'd hardly be worth any broker's time with that risk/reward, unless they are hosing the borrower with insane fees. Though if that's the case, putting up collateral would be cheaper (even if you have to borrow it from somewhere).

load more comments (1 replies)