this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
198 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37634 readers
374 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Hey, look at that. It's the inevitable consequence of the game theory of first past the post voting. Voting system reform is my #1 issue, and if you actually care about the fact that "99% of voters" are locked into voting for someone they dislike to avert disaster every 4 years, it should be yours as well.

There is no meaningful future for third parties until and unless this occurs. IRV is a good first step, but Score voting is better. Multimember districts are also important. Getting rid of the electoral college is a no-brainer.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thank you for your perspective.

Voting system reform is my #1 issue

Respectfully, I don't think it is. You've seen the same history I have and, whether you want to acknowledge it or not, you know how your Democratic vote reinforces that which you say you want to change.

[–] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only there were other things that a person could do outside of voting once every four years to participate in the political process.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago

Agreed.

If only.

load more comments (2 replies)