this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
993 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

10348 readers
1839 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Trev625@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago (17 children)

I went down a huge rabbit hole cause of this. I personally like °F over °C but agree it's arbitrary. So I tried to make a scale that started at the coldest air temp on earth (some day in Antarctica) and went to the hottest day on earth (some day in death valley) and put the coldest day at 0°A and the hottest at 100°A.

Sadly this made a scale that was less precise than I'd like. I like that I can feel the difference between 73°F and 74°F and don't want to have to use decimals.

So maybe the end points could be only places where people actually live. Well it looks like some people live in Russia around -70°C and some people live in northern Africa around 50°C so if you just take °C and add 60 you can get a -10 to 110 scale where most temps would fall between 0 and 100. Still has the unit difference of °C (which I don't like) but I like that most temps are between 0 and 100. I also don't really like negative temperature since it seems wonky.

To "fix" the unit scale you could just multiply everything by 2 so the difference between each full degree is half as much. So temps would be between -20 and 220. °A = 2(°C + 60) °A = 2(°C) + 120

And it turns out I (basically) created the Fahrenheit scale but moved. °F= 1.8(°C) + 32

TL;DR: I'm stupid and this was fun but also a waste of time lol

[–] Gremour@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Celsius is tied to points of ice melting and water vaporising. Since water is very important for the life on our planet, it makes even more sense than arbitrary chosen meters or seconds.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

At sea level. Welcome to La Paz, where the triple point is made up and the freezing point doesn't matter!

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And similarly, Fahrenheit seems to be tied to the internal temperature of the human body, with 100 degrees being the maximum that the average person can handle before their organs start to be damaged.

[–] Gremour@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yes, Fahrenheit is about humans, and Celsius is about the element that makes life possible. The latter is more generic.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But not everybody experiences temperature the same, so using a system based on what 'humans' like, seems a bit useless

It's not about what humans "like," it's about the human bodies' internal operating temperature and using that as a reference point, the same way that Celsius is about the states of matter of water . Fahrenheit is useful in medicine for that reason, while Celsius is useful anytime a comparison to water is helpful, and beyond that, it's really just whatever you grew up with. Using a system based on what water "likes" is equally as useless unless you grew up using it as your reference point for temperature in your daily life. Neither 75 Fahrenheit or 23.8889 Celsius tell me whether or not I'm going to need a jacket today unless I've already experienced said temperature and use that scale in my daily life.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Maximum is 100 °F and minimum is 95 °F. Those seem pretty arbitrary to me

load more comments (13 replies)