this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
323 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

58070 readers
2799 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 155 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (71 children)

In two years time Apple, and every other smartphone manufacturer on the EU market for that matter, will be forced to make the battery user replaceable and that one will most likely benefit everyone; unless Apple wants to release two versions of every iPhone to comply with EU regulations which they won't.

[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 112 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

Just like with USB-C, which the EU regulated and now the iPad and IPhone have.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 97 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

the stupidest thing is iPad had USB-C since 2018! and yet on iPhones they latched on to lightning for another 6 years before EU forced them to standardize

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That’s because they’ve been pushing the iPad as a sort of Mac Lite, but they can’t do that unless you can plug peripherals or a thumb drive into it. You can 100% plug a USB-C laptop dock into an iPad, and it’ll work. You can even use a mouse with it if you really want to.

But they wanted to keep Lightning around as long as possible, because they made a commission on every single lighting cable that was sold; Companies had to license the rights to use the connector, and had to pay Apple for every one they used. That’s why Lightning cables were always a few bucks more expensive than a comparable USB-C cable. That extra few bucks was going straight into Apple’s pocket. It was a huge source of passive income for the company, which they were reluctant to let go of.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They were keeping their promise of 10 years of Lightning ecosystem support. Dropping the old iPod connector was highly controversial.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 44 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They were earning millions from lightning royalities

[–] Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And they promised to do so for at least 10 years.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

we promise we'll use the inferior, proprietary connector

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

we promise we'll use the inferior, proprietary connector

Honestly Lightning wasn’t inferior when it launched in 2012, two years before the design of USB-C was even published. And in some ways I actually prefer it physically (though obviously I would much rather all my devices use USB-C now as it is a much superior connector).

Lightning was reversible where Micro-USB was not, and Lightning’s female port is entirely a hole that the entirely-a-prong male plug goes into, whereas with USB (like with most connectors) the female side has something sticking up inside it that slots into the male plug. This means Lightning is much easier to clean, which becomes necessary because phones in people’s pockets collect lint.

I’m thrilled that iPhone has moved to USB-C, but people forget how much better Lightning was than both the 30-pin iPod connector AND Micro-USB.

[–] Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Absolutely it was better. But it’s hard to believe that Apple, who was a part of the USB-IF, didn’t know USB-C was in the works. My conspiracy theory is they knew an open standard was imminent and launched lightning to keep getting those MFI licensing checks and purposely made that long of a commitment strictly so, when regulators asked why they hadn’t switched to the new standard yet, they could say it was to “help the environment.”

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Absolutely it was better. But it’s hard to believe that Apple, who was a part of the USB-IF, didn’t know USB-C was in the works. My conspiracy theory is they knew an open standard was imminent and launched lightning to keep getting those MFI licensing checks and purposely made that long of a commitment strictly so, when regulators asked why they hadn’t switched to the new standard yet, they could say it was to “help the environment.”

Oh probably. We know that by the time they finally dropped Lightning, MFi certification was earning them like $4b per year.

There was even rumor they were going to limit charging speeds over USB-C unless they were detectably “MFi” USB-C cables. Ostensibly to prevent damage to the phone from bad cables, but obviously an attempt to maintain MFi income. I don’t remember if they went through with it.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The two are not mutually exclusive. The downvote button is not an "I don't like this" button.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

"We promise to keep increasing our profit by overcharging customers for awful cables they can't get anywhere else"

What a dumb promise

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Phones used to have a round charger socket, a USB socket that could also be used to charge, plus the headphone socket and SD card slot. I'm sure they could have found room for both USB C and Lightning, with all the other things that were removed.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (67 replies)