this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
79 points (98.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5208 readers
1147 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aniki@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I've started to experiment with much more southern zoned flora in my spaces in New England now that we don't have a winter and anything that can survive a frost or two has been doing really well. Southern England has palm trees. I want palms outside my house year round if I am going to survive these bullshit winters we now get. I know I might be introducing an invasive species but I think climate change is the far bigger worry than me and my little experiments.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

As a Californian, don’t do it, palms suck. Most of them have very sharp, dangerous thorns, and they don’t provide much environmental benefits compared to a normal tree.

[–] mars296@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most palms do not have thorns. This is the first time I have ever heard this claim. There is 2,600 known species.

But yes they are not shade trees.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well the common ones in California do. I assume they would plant similar species as only a few are hardy to frosts.

Just make sure to avoid Phoenix palms. That’s the most common one in my area and they have like 6 inch spines that can cause serious injuries. They’re also quite weedy.