this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
496 points (99.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39206 readers
396 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 102 points 1 month ago (27 children)

Sorry. I chose .local and I'm sticking to it.

[–] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I still haven't heard a convincing argument to not use .local and I see no reason to stop.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mainly conflicts with mDNS. However it's shitty IMHO that the mDNS spec snarfed a domain already in widespread use, should have used .mDNS or similar.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

That I agree with. Microsoft drafted the recommendation to use it for local networks, and Apple ignored it or co-opted it for mDNS.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)