this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
527 points (97.1% liked)

Fediverse

28220 readers
1153 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I'm not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RxBrad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Honestly, I'm kind of bummed that so many people are stomping their feet and saying they don't want the big guy to find their little cabin in the woods.

If mas.to -- where I signed up for Mastodon -- defederates Threads, I'm just going to lose access to the vast population that will simply use that easiest means of joining the Fediverse.

Defederating is just going to chase droves of people off independent servers and into the arms of Zuck.

[–] g8phcon2@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if they do, you can just folow them for here right? Or does lemmy.world have less features than kbin.social?

[–] RxBrad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe I'm completely misinterpreting it... but my impression is that if my Mastodon instance defederates Threads, then I cannot interact, in any way, with anyone on Threads from my account on the defederating instance.

I'm on mas.to. The admin already publicly stated that Meta invited them to talks. They declined. And they even blocked Meta's access to anything mas.to before Threads was even a thing. Defederation is probably a foregone conclusion there.

load more comments (13 replies)