this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
614 points (98.6% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17305 readers
448 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

[Image description: a perfectly round peeled bulb of garlic on a cutting board, with unpeeled normal cloves behind it.]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rjthyen@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but a garlic plant grows some form of a "seed" head, that will have miniature round bulbs in it if they aren't clipped off that, it's my understanding, when they are planted they'll grow like this in the first year and into a normal garlic bulb year two. I've never experimented enough to know if I'm correct, but if my info is correct I'd guess either one of those got mixed in by mistake, or if your planting in the same spot as the year prior one might've just fallen off.

[–] DinosaurSr@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I got one of those this year. I grow hard neck and must have missed the scape on this one.

The bulb and the "seed head"(?) in the pic are the same plant, just bent in half so both are visible

[–] rjthyen@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Missed the whole scape not just one individual bulb I'm guessing? My brain was struggling to piece together what i was looking at lol

[–] DinosaurSr@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Haha yeah sorry that's a bad pic. The scape is the curly thing that grows off the top of the plant in the spring, and then and flowers. If you're growing garlic, you'd normally cut the scape so that the plant puts more energy into the bulb instead of the flower. Here's a pic of the whole thing:

load more comments (1 replies)